Sherr Law Group

Effective Litigation Solutions

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Camp Owners
  • Services
    • Municipal Law
    • Employment Law
    • Insurance Defense
    • Products Liability
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
    • Ardmore
    • Bala Cynwyd
    • Collegeville
    • Conshohocken
    • Harrisburg
    • King of Prussia
    • Lansdale
    • Montgomery County
    • Narberth
    • Pennsylvania
    • Philadelphia
    • Scranton
    • Wayne
    • Whitpain Hills

Social Media in Employment and Municipal Law: The Road Raging Employee

September 16, 2019 By Tony Sherr

Social Media in Employment & Municipal Law: The Road Raging Employee | Sherr Law Group

Social media is undoubtedly one of the great communication tools of our time. But using sites like Facebook and Instagram doesn’t come without repercussions. There are limits to freedom of speech, particularly in the employment setting; when speech exceeds those limits, employers have to deal with the consequences.

Because of the sensitive and public nature of some municipal employees’ job functions, government employers must be especially aware of the way their employees use social media as a platform to discuss their views. My work as a municipal law attorney in employment matters has exposed me to numerous scenarios where employees have been reprimanded for posting inappropriate or confidential information – either about their workplace, co-workers or elected officials or about the personal values or political views they hold.

Today, I want to discuss one particular case where a municipal employer was determined to have overstepped its bounds after terminating an employee for a post she made in a local Facebook group. It serves as a cautionary tale for municipalities: know your employees’ rights thoroughly before considering disciplinary action or termination because of social media activities. If you do not do your due diligence in this area, you may find yourself in the midst of a lawsuit.

How Carr v. PennDOT Came to Be

In this case, a Pennsylvania Department of Transportation employee named Rachel Carr had a rough day on the road (off the clock) and vented via a local Facebook group. She was displeased with how some of the local school bus drivers allegedly drove erratically and felt it was dangerous. She ended her rant saying, “I don’t give a flying **** about those babies and I will gladly smash into a school bus.” Carr initially got herself into trouble because her Facebook profile listed PennDOT as her employer, and her higher ups were not pleased when they heard about this rant.

The Repercussions of a “Rant”

Some members of the Facebook group saw Carr’s rant and determined she was a PennDOT employee by viewing her profile. They shared screenshots of the rant on PennDOT’s Facebook page expressing concern. Carr’s decidedly graphic rant was a major cause of concern for the Department of Transportation, too. Carr, a probationary employee at the time, was fired as a result of these posts.

However, Carr and her attorneys did not agree with PennDOT’s decision to terminate her employment and asserted that the Department discriminated against her; they claimed that this was a violation of the Civil Service Act.

Initially, the State Civil Service Commission ruled that PennDOT was justified in terminating Carr’s employment. It felt her statements were disruptive and that she was not successful in presenting sufficient evidence to back up her claim of a rights violation. This decision was appealed by Carr’s attorneys, though, and with an interesting outcome: the decision was reversed.

A Reversal on Appeal

The appeals Court held that the employee’s comments addressed a matter of public concern; and that she was speaking outside the scope of her employment. The Court believed that Carr expressed her beliefs and concerns in a reprehensible manner, but that the language she used did not have any bearing on whether her statements did speak to a matter of public concern.

The appellate court reversed the State Civil Service Commission’s ruling that Carr had not sufficiently argued her case of discrimination. It ordered that Carr be reinstated to her probationary position with the Department of Transportation and asserted that she was entitled to lost wages for the time she was not working with the Department.

Municipalities Can Learn from Carr v. PennDOT

If this case shows us anything, it is that municipalities and government agencies must be extremely clear on an employee’s rights before taking disciplinary action against that employee. While private sector employers may “exercise wide latitude in terminating employees for their social media posts,” public employers face more constraints in this area and must consider the rights of the employee under the Pennsylvania and United States Constitutions.

If you are a municipal employer, you must ensure that you have a written policy in place, which respects the bounds of an individual’s constitutional guarantees.  In addition, if you received information about an employee’s unacceptable social media usage – whether in the workplace or in their personal time – please consult a municipal law attorney before proceeding with disciplinary action. A Pennsylvania municipal law lawyer who specializes in employment matters, can also help your organization create an iron-clad social media policy for the workplace that will clearly inform employees of the consequences of their actions. It is my hope that municipal employers will take these proactive steps to avoid a long and taxing court case.

Filed Under: Employment Law, Municipal Law

Tony Sherr

About Tony Sherr

Anthony Sherr’s extensive experience includes matters involving commercial litigation, municipal liability, civil rights, employment law, products liability, and land use matters. He has tried over 50 cases in Federal and State courts throughout Pennsylvania. Learn More >

Categories

  • Camps and Camp Owners
  • Commercial Litigation
  • COVID-19
  • Employment Law
  • Firm News
  • Insurance
  • Mediation
  • Municipal Law
  • Products Liability

Archives

  • November 2020
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • October 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016

Office Address

Sherr Law Group
101 West Airy Street, Suite 100
Norristown, PA 19401

Phone: (484) 591-3000
www.SherrLawGroup.com

Sherr Law Group

Founded on principles of education, collaboration and mutual respect, Sherr Law Group is dedicated to putting our decades of experience to work in pursuit of justice for our clients. We put ourselves in your shoes.

Sherr Law Group

101 W Airy St Suite 100
Norristown, PA 19401
Get directions

Call Today: (484) 591-3000

Join Our Mailing List

Sign Up to Receive Our Newsletter →

Recent Posts

  • My Company is Being Sued – Now What?
  • Pennsylvania Businesses Can Document Efforts to Reduce Losses When Filing a Business Interruption Claim From COVID-19
  • COVID-19 Produces Its First Wrongful Death Suit in Pennsylvania
  • Do Act of God Clauses Include COVID-19?
  • Pennsylvania Municipal Governments Can Prepare to Defend Against Possible Wrongful Death Lawsuits from COVID-19

Can’t find what you’re looking for?

Connect on Social Media

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 Sherr Law Group · Law Firm Marketing by PSM Marketing · Log in