Sherr Law Group

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Camp Owners
  • Services
    • Municipal Law
    • Employment Law
    • Insurance Defense
    • Products Liability
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

August 18, 2016 By Tony Sherr

The Future is now in products liability law in Pennsylvania after Tincher v. Omega Flex

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court after several fits and starts did not “adopt” Restatement of Tort (Third) §402(A); but nonetheless, set products liability law on a new course in Pennsylvania. In its aftermath, Tincher has created plenty of opportunities for both pro-plaintiff and pro-defendant interpretation of the decision of shat it all means in practical everyday application.

The Supreme Court through now retired Chief Justice Ronald Castille, criticized both the notion that a Court would “adopt” a restatement and the development of products liability law in Pennsylvania.

While many argue that the Court’s refusal to “adopt” the Restatement (Third) Torts 402(A) was a rejection of its contents and an endorsement of the previously adopted Restatement (Second) Torts 402(A).

To the contrary, the Court rejected the jurisprudence which prevailed in Pennsylvania and the Restatement (Second). Instead, Chief Justice Castille wrote:

This Opinion does not purport to either approve or disapprove prior decisional law, or available alternatives suggested by commentators or the Restatements, relating to foundational or subsidiary considerations and consequences of our explicit holdings.

About the only point that everyone agrees upon is that proving an action in strict liability requires proof in the alternative, either of the ordinary consumer’ expectations or of the risk utility of a product. While the Court commented upon the two standards, it clearly left such questions as to whether the Tincher holding applied to failure to warn cases (Superior Court says yes, Federal District Court says no); is expert testimony necessary to prove either theory? What is the gatekeeping function of the Courts in terms of whether a matter should be submitted to a jury, and to what extent may a Court rely upon standards contained in the Third Restatement, but not the Second.

Unfortunately, for those who seek clarity and concrete “horn book” rules of law, Tincher asks many more questions than it answers. It is now up to the practitioners in this area to make the arguments, and the Courts to establish the rules of products liability going forward. Please check back in for developments.

Tony Sherr just recently argued the effect of Tincher on a case in which summary judgment was granted pre-Tincher and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals remanded for a determination of the effect of Tincher on the summary judgment.


Ronald Sherr has conducted more than 800 mediations and arbitrations through ADR Options since 2003. He specializes in complex cases in all facets of construction law, as well as medical malpractice, products liability, personal injury and other areas of civil law.

Filed Under: Products Liability

Can’t find what you’re looking for?

About Tony Sherr

Anthony Sherr’s extensive experience includes matters involving commercial litigation, municipal liability, civil rights, employment law, products liability, and land use matters. He has tried over 50 cases in Federal and State courts throughout Pennsylvania. Learn More >

Categories

  • Camps and Camp Owners
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Employment Law
  • Firm News
  • Mediation
  • Municipal Law
  • Products Liability

Archives

  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016

Take a Look

  • Blog
  • Contact Us
    • Thank You for Contacting Sherr Law Group
  • Our Team
    • Anthony R. Sherr
    • Lisa Ondich
    • Pamela D. Harper
    • Ronald Sherr
    • Stephen Dotts
  • Services
    • Camp Owners and Directors in Pennsylvania
      • Avoiding Sexual Harassment in a Camping Environment: Tips and Strategies
      • Camp Experience
    • Municipal Law Firm in Pennsylvania
      • Municipal Law Experience
    • Employment Law Attorneys in Pennsylvania
      • Employment Law Experience
    • Insurance Defense Lawyer in Pennsylvania
      • Insurance Experience
    • Products Liability Lawyer in Pennsylvania
      • Products Liability Experience
  • Welcome to Sherr Law Group

Office Address

Sherr Law Group
101 West Airy Street, Suite 100
Norristown, PA 19401

Phone: (484) 591-3000
www.SherrLawGroup.com

Sherr Law Group

Founded on principles of education, collaboration and mutual respect, Sherr Law Group is dedicated to putting our decades of experience to work in pursuit of justice for our clients. We put ourselves in your shoes.

Sherr Law Group

101 W Airy St Suite 100
Norristown, PA 19401
Get directions
(484) 591-3000

Join Our Mailing List

Sign Up to Receive Our Newsletter>

Recent Posts

  • Tony Sherr to Present “Avoiding Sexual Harassment in a Camping Environment: Tips and Strategies” on March 15, 2018
  • Tony Sherr Co-Chair of Annual Israel Awareness Day
  • Holiday Fun at the Sherr Law Group
  • Sherr Law Group Announces Win for Spring Township Police
  • 60 Years of Practice Makes Perfect

Can’t find what you’re looking for?

Connect on Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2018 Sherr Law Group · Law Firm Marketing by Professional Services Marketing · Log in